you have no proof that Tibet was a Manchurian occupied
you have no proof any Manchu general went into Tibet to
occupy Tibet .
the Manchu fought hard to occupy Hotan ,
the bottom of Tibetan Plateau .
you have no Manchu general actually occupied Lhasa , and the
of the Tibetan Highland Plateau ,
SianSianSian is a Chinese , therefore Siansainsain is falsifying
Chinese history as usual .
no Manchu emperor has occupied Tibet .
You Chinese are just fantasizing your own theory on Tibet ,
just like you Chinese are fantasizing the history of the 3
which were all false,
the battles and the intrigues of the 3 kingdoms published
by Chinese .
companies were all false , were all fantasies invented by
Chinese story tellers .
Post by Siansiansian
Shang dynasty was a slave owning dynasty .
there was no sucj name as CHINA before the unification of
during the Chou ( Zhow ) Dynasty in 800 BC .
Before the Shang Salve Dynasty in 1700 BC , there was no
such a thing
as the Chinese people,
the Chinese people were originally known as the Hua people
and the Xia people , from two different tribes in around
along the Yellow River .
look up the meaning of Hua and of Xia .
Does anyone know the history and genealogy of China's present Han-
Chinese Imperial Family?
There is no race called Chinese. It is a term used to described all
people under Qing Dynasty, namely Manchurian occupied territory, which
include Tibet, Xinjiang Mongolia, north-eastern and North-western
part under Russia nowadays.
And who care who is the Han Imperial Chinese? Most importantly, people
can live and enjoy life peacefully generation after generation.